Alia preguntado en Science & MathematicsChemistry · hace 1 mes

is this traingle are conguent?

7 respuestas

  • hace 4 semanas

    Grammatically your sentence does not make sense. 

    You refer to 'one' triangle by the use of 'is' , then change to the plural  triangles by the use of 'are' .  You should write 'Are these triangles congruent?'

    For congruency you need to use the plural 'are' because there are at least two triangles under consideration.  Secondly, you have not shown the triangle(s) , so congruency cannot be proved. 

  • Anónimo
    hace 4 semanas

    Is my butt congruent to your ***?

  • Snezzy
    Lv 7
    hace 1 mes

    Let me try to interpret what I think you might want to know.

    Yes, you can buy ginger ale at a convenience store. No, troglodytes are not contingent. And the Moon's diameter is 15% even though it is 18 times as far away.

  • hace 1 mes

    What is a "traingle"? And "conguent"? A tangle  of trains? Whatever it is, how can one thing by itself, be congruent?

    Kind of like asking, is this square larger?

  • ¿Qué te parecieron las respuestas? Puedes iniciar sesión para votar por la respuesta.
  • hace 1 mes

    Yes . . . they is.

  • Anónimo
    hace 1 mes

    This is not a question about Chemistry.  It needs moving, probably to Mathematics.

  • david
    Lv 7
    hace 1 mes

    Sure, why not.  traingles are always conguent.

¿Aún tienes preguntas? Pregunta ahora para obtener respuestas.