Strangers are supposedly a "protected class" according to Exodus 22, but they are not "universally protected" at all because it is okay to kill a stranger, or to kill as many as possible in a legitimate war situation, whereby the ENEMY are clearly STRANGERS.
As attested by Israel's destruction and genocide of foreigners in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 20:16-17).
True or false?Politicshace 1 día
Humans are only concerned about the disabled people from their own background. But they don't actually care about other disabled people....?
True or false?2 respuestasPoliticshace 4 días
The secular law and religious law are juxtaposed against the backdrop of society. But they are clearly distinct and separate. True or false?
The Christian Bible does not recognize the so called "protected categories" listed under the secular law, such as the disabled, children and pregnant women, etc.
Because the New Testament is primarily concerned about the doctrine that "there is no Jew or Greek, male or female, slave or free" (Galatians 3:28) and the idea that "there are no innocent people at all" (Romans 3:10, 23, Ecclesiastes 7:20) under the new covenant.
Which means that God has the right to treat everybody the same, and thereby condemn everyone on a "no holds barred basis" (Ezekiel 18:4, Romans 6:23), based on the reality of their sins instead of their putative membership (or non-membership) of a "protected class".
Ultimately, it means that God has the right to Judge or condemn anyone, regardless of their alleged disability, age or pregnant status, etc.
But of course, the religious law of the Bible has always been juxtaposed against the secular laws, norms and values of this country, which implies that there is potential conflict and tension between the different sets of rules.
Nevertheless, God's Will and His Holy Judgment must ultimately prevail (Daniel 4:35, Isaiah 55:11, Matthew 25:41, 46), regardless of the juxtaposition and the existence of secular laws, norms and values.
True or false?4 respuestasReligion & Spiritualityhace 4 días
Why does the UK Military Intelligence recruit low life inferior people who are from the Third world?
Why do they employ people who are racially inferior to work for this organisation?Politicshace 4 días
Because they have hired racially inferior people who are working as double agents for the UK and its Third world counterparts.
Consequently, such a treachery is encouraged by the UK Military Intelligence because they have hired people who have divided loyalties who have no right to live, but should be deported to the Third world.
True or false?
Are all detainees required to remove their shoe laces, footwear and trouser belts?
Are personal belongings such as your wallet and cellphone confiscated whilst you are detained?
Does the aforementioned apply across the EU, or does it simply reflect the "internal politics" of certain countries within the EU?
41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the
EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 FOR I WAS HUNGRY AND YOU GAVE ME NO FOOD; I WAS THIRSTY AND YOU GAVE ME NO DRINK; 43 I WAS A STRANGER AND YOU DID NOT TAKE ME IN, NAKED AND YOU DID NOT CLOTHE ME, SICK AND IN PRISON AND YOU DID NOT VISIT ME.'44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”
Some have argued that, "There is only finite punishment for finite sin", which is refuted by the Canonical Gospel of Matthew, chapter 25.
Accordingly, the bold script in verse 42 and verse 43 are but a few examples of "finite sins", which will be punished by "Everlasting hell" in verse 41 and verse 46.
That "finite sins" will be punished by "Eternal hell" is indisputable according to the actual meaning of Matthew 25.3 respuestasPoliticshace 2 semanas
41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’ 44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”
Revelation 20:10 The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. AND THEY WILL BE TORMENTED DAY AND NIGHT FOREVER AND EVER.
The above Scripture (bold type) is loud and clear and IRREFUTABLE.
That "Hell is everlasting", but Revelation 20:12-14 does nothing at all to contradict the idea that "Hell is everlasting".
Because the Bible cannot possibly contradict itself, and there is nothing at all in Revelation 20:12-14 to say that "Hell is only temporary".5 respuestasReligion & Spiritualityhace 2 semanas
President Xi Jinping, Jesus is going to use his powers to make you defecate in your pants. But what are you going to do about it, eh?
Jesus will use his powers to publicly humiliate President Xi Jinping, but what are you going to do about it?Politicshace 2 semanas
President Xi Jinping cannot use China's nuclear weapons to threaten any nation, but Jesus can still use his powers to punish him. T or F?
Whereas, China cannot use their nuclear weapons to threaten any nation Jesus can still use the power of "words" to punish, harm and humiliate President Xi Jinping and all the members of the Politburo.
But what are you going to do about it, eh?
How can you avoid being hurt and humiliated?3 respuestasPoliticshace 2 semanas
Having nuclear weapons doesn't mean that you can use them to attack Western nations with total impunity.
Because no nation can win a nuclear war, which means that such weapons can only be a deterrent, but you could never actually use them to threaten any other country.
In practice, China's nuclear arsenal is practically useless in the face of mere "words", which can be spoken to punish and humiliate any member of the Politburo Standing Committee, NPC and PLA.
Ultimately, your threat of "nuclear war" is to no avail because mere "words" can still be used to punish and humiliate China's political leaders.
But what are you going to do about it, President Xi?
How are you going to avoid being battered by mere "words"?
No army can win a war without their equivalent of NCO's and Senior military officers. True or false ?
The army is easy prey if you could eliminate all of the NCO's and Senior military officers.
Because the army cannot be organised by professional private soldiers who lack the required expertise and know how to undertake basic tactical operations.
True or false?
You can starve the enemy into submission by eliminating all of their military and political leaders. True or false?
By eliminating everyone who has expertise in macroeconomics you can destroy their economic organisation and starve them into submission, and therefore make the country susceptible to foreign invasion.
True or false?
The question of "outward appearance" cannot be the sole determining criterion since they are twins, but they don't have the same appearance (or colour) at all.
Ultimately, the question of "ethnicity" is not entirely down to the "outward appearance" of the individuals concerned.
As attested by the above example.
True or false?
The Sun newspaper had produced an article depicting the birth of twins who are dissimilar in terms of their colour.
Apparently, one is 'black', but the other one is 'white'.
So what is their "ethnicity" given that they are twins, but they don't have the same colour or appearance?2 respuestasPoliticshace 2 semanas
Because there is an obsessive focus on sexual abstinence, more so than the Mainstream churches, which makes their religion inferior to Christianity in the mainstream.
Sexual morality and abstinence is far less important than the new covenant's requirement to "honour" and "glorify" God (Romans 1:21), and to "Confess the lordship of Jesus Christ" (Romans 10:9).
True or false?
Ethnicity is a social and political construct invented by the political establishment. True or false?
The "boundaries of ethnicity" are most often unfair and arbitrary ones because it is a socially constructed device that is intended to advance the interests of certain groups.
You could be on either side of the fence depending on the actual time, place or society, because ethnicity is an "arbitrary social construct" that is invented by the political establishment.
True or false?2 respuestasPoliticshace 2 semanas
God's Kingdom is not only a spiritual kingdom per se, but is also an earthly kingdom. So what are you going to do about it, eh?
Daniel 2:34 You watched while a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were crushed together, and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away so that no trace of them was found. AND THE STONE THAT STRUCK THE IMAGE BECAME A GREAT MOUNTAIN AND FILLED THE WHOLE EARTH.
Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.
Revelation 21:1 NOW I SAW A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea.
The above Scripture has served to illustrate the new covenant doctrine that God's Kingdom is Not a "spiritual kingdom per se", but is also an "earthly kingdom".
So, what are you going to do about it, eh?6 respuestasReligion & Spiritualityhace 2 semanas